Modular Robotic Vehicle (MRV)

NASA is currently developing the next generation space suit for future missions, including the optimization of space suit gloves. When non-assisted space suit gloves are coupled to a pressurized suit and operated in a vacuum, they tend to limit the range of motion of an astronaut's hand to as little as 20% of normal range. Many of NASA's future missions will be in challenging environments where an astronauts hand dexterity will be critical for the success of NASA missions. Innovators at JSC have improved the performance on the second-generation, robotically assisted SSRG, to reduce exertion and improve the hand strength and dexterity of an astronaut in situ. The SSRGs system detects user finger movements using string potentiometers and contact with objects using force-sensitive resistors (FSRs). FSRs are imbedded in the distal and medial phalanges, palmar side of the glove. To move a finger, an actuator pulls a tendon through a Bowden Cable system which transfers mechanical pulling force of an inner cable relative to a hollow outer cable, like the brakes on a bicycle, as seen in the Figure below. An improved controller commands the new, more powerful linear actuator to drive tendon operation while minding custom controller parameters inputted through a digital editor tool. The Space Suit RoboGlove is at TRL 6 (system/subsystem model or prototype demonstrated in a relevant environment) and it is now available for licensing. Please note that NASA does not manufacture products itself for commercial sale.

Since NASAs Apollo program of the late 1960s and 1970s, many previous LTV hand controllers (e.g., joysticks, T-handles) were developed and utilized albeit with shortcomings. Some of these options yielded the desired level of control but were too physically taxing to use for long periods of time in a spacesuit environment. Others simply did not offer the necessary fine motor control. Thus, there has been a long-standing need for controllers that improve upon both of these limitations. The Tri-Rotor is a novel hand controller designed to reduce operator fatigue, add control capabilities (beyond those of a joystick), and increase the fidelity of control inputs. The design consists of two slotted handles that rotate independently within opposite sides of the Tri-Rotor main-body. Each handle is programmable and can rotate 45 degrees. In this iteration, the right handle rotates counterclockwise and acts as an accelerator and brake. The left handle rotates both clockwise and counterclockwise and controls crabbing whereby the vehicles rear wheels turn in the same direction as the front wheels facilitating diagonal or possibly lateral movement. The main-body of the Tri-Rotor rotates upon a central pivot like an automotive steering wheel and can provide directional input for Ackermann-like steering. The handles on the Tri-Rotor are designed with spacesuit kinematics in mind and are operated using the pronated and supinated motions of the astronauts hands allowed by the wrist bearings between the glove and the forearm of the spacesuit. The devices central steering pivot is also operated by the hands and is leveraged by the up and down motions of the arms allowed by the constant volume joints in the spacesuits shoulders. This hand controller design staves off operator fatigue and sheds the need for separate fine-dexterity controls without sacrificing precision. The Tri-Rotor Hand Controller has a technology readiness level (TRL) 5 (component and/or breadboard validation in relevant environment) and is now available for patent licensing. Please note that NASA does not manufacture products itself for commercial sale.

NASA, GM, and Oceaneering approached the development of R2 from a dual use environment for both space and terrestrial application. NASA needed an astronaut assistant able to function in space and GM was looking for a robot that could function in an industrial setting. With this in mind, R2 was made with many capabilities that offer an enormous advantage in industrial environments. For example, the robot has the ability to retool and vary its tasks. Rather than a product moving from station to station on a conveyor with dozens of specialized robots performing unique tasks, R2 can handle several assembly steps at a single station, thereby reducing manufacturing floor space requirements and the need for multiple robots for the same activities. The robot can also be used in scenarios where dangerous chemicals, biological, or even nuclear materials are part of the manufacturing process. R2 uses stereovision to locate human teammates or tools and a navigation system. The robot was also designed with special torsional springs and position feedback to control fine motor movements in the hands and arms. R2's hands and arms sense weight and pressure and stop when they come in contact with someone or something. These force sensing capabilities make R2 safe to work side-by-side with people on an assembly line, assisting them in ergonomically challenging tasks or working independently. This NASA Technology is available for your company to license and develop into a commercial product. NASA does not manufacture products for commercial sale.

Regolith excavation is desired in future space missions for the purpose of In Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) to make local commodities, such as propellants and breathing air, and to pursue construction operations. The excavation of regolith on another planetary body surface, such as the Moon, Mars, an asteroid, or a comet is extremely difficult because of the high bulk density of regolith at lower depths. Additionally, because of the low gravity in these space surface environments, the mass of the excavator vehicle does not provide enough reaction force to enable the excavation blade to penetrate the regolith if traditional terrestrial methods are used. RASSOR uses counterrotating bucket drums on opposing arms to provide near-zero horizontal and minimal vertical net reaction force so that excavation is not reliant on the traction or weight of the mobility system to provide a reaction force to counteract the excavation force in low-gravity environments. The excavator can traverse steep slopes and rough terrain, and its symmetrical design enables it to operate in reverse so that it can recover from overturning by continuing to dig in the new orientation. The system is capable of standing up in a vertical position to dump into a receiving hopper without using a ramp. This eliminates the need for an onboard dump bin, thus reducing complexity and weight. During loading, the bucket drums excavate soil/regolith by scoops mounted on the drums exteriors that sequentially take multiple cuts of soil/regolith while rotating at approximately 20 revolutions per minute. During hauling, the bucket drums are raised by rotating the arms to provide clearance above the surface being excavated. The mobility platform can then travel while the soil/regolith remains in the raised bucket drums. When the excavator reaches the dump location, the bucket drums are commanded to reverse their direction of rotation, which causes soil/regolith to be expelled out of each successive scoop. RASSOR has wireless control, telemetry, and onboard transmitting cameras, allowing for teleoperation with situational awareness. The unit can be programmed to operate autonomously for selected tasks.

Significant contributors to the cost of launching nano- and micro-satellites to orbit are the costs of software, and Guidance, Navigation and Control (GNC) avionics systems that steer, navigate and control the launch vehicles, sequence stage separation, deploy payloads, and pass data to Telemetry. The high costs of these GNC avionics systems are due in part to the current practice of developing unique, custom, single-use hardware and software for each launch, and requiring high-precision measurements of position and attitude states. NASA Ames Research Center has developed and tested a low-cost avionics system prototype called Affordable Vehicle Avionics (AVA). AVA integrates a low-cost moderately-precise sensor suite with an advanced error-correcting software package to provide GNC for space launch vehicles in a package smaller than a multilayer sandwich (100 mm x 120 mm x 69 mm; 4in x 4.7in x 2.7in), and with a mass of less than 0.84kg (2lbs). The invention provides a common suite of avionics components and demonstration software that deliver affordable, capable GNC with flexible I/O which is applicable to a variety of nano/micro-sat launch vehicles at less than 10 percent of the cost to procure current state-of-the-art GNC avionics. Affordable Vehicle Avionics' (AVA's) approach to drastically reduce costs includes: (1) use of low-cost "tactical-grade" Commercial-off-the-Shelf MicroElectroMechanical Systems (MEMS) inertial measurement unit, wherein adequate navigation precision is achieved by fusing outputs from a Global Positioning System receiver, inertial sensors and a magnetic field vector sensor in an extended Kalman filter formulation that corrects inertial sensor biases; (2) a streamlined "cookbook" approach to define an effective process for launch vehicle developers to design, simulate, verify and support assembly, integration and testing of their SLVs, driven by high-fidelity six degrees of freedom SLV simulations and real-time hardware-in-loop tests to validate guidance, navigation and control for early test flights. Development Status: As of spring 2020, AVA has flown twice in its current configuration on a suborbital platform. Its navigation and control functions were successfully demonstrated for roll-rate control within a tight deadband onboard the first flight test, and it successfully issued attitude pointing commands to a failed reaction control subsystem and it issues issued a rocket-motor ignition command on a second flight test. To date, failure of SLV components other than AVA (e.g., electrical power) has precluded demonstration of navigation and control of an orbital or sub-orbital launch system, which remains to be demonstrated. AVA development was accomplished using a single magnetometer-based magnetic field vector sensor to provide attitude observability during free-fall (inter-stage coast periods). Therefore, the current tested AVA configuration is susceptible to magnetic/electric fields produced by other components and payloads onboard the SLV, so care must be exercised to either mount AVA well away from sources of such fields and or to incorporate magnetic/electric field barriers on field emitters if separation from emitters is inadequate. Also, licensees may wish to provide new AVA inputs from a pair of external horizon sensors to provide more accurate attitude navigation during coast phases of the SLV mission.